UNDERVALUED URANIUM PLAY- CLEANTECH VANADIUM MINING CORPORATION
Fluorspar (commonly known as Fluorite) could potentially be one of the key bottlenecks for uranium enrichment much like sulfuric acid currently is for uranium production. Most people, even those involved in the uranium sector didn’t see the sulfuric acid shortages coming, I’m here to tell you fluorspar could be the next bottleneck for uranium enrichment, don’t say I didn’t warn you! CleanTech CTV (TSXV: $CTV.v | OTCQB: $CTVFF) aims to be a massive producer of fluorspar.
Fluorspar is not just important in uranium production, it is also important in a number of other fast growing industry sectors such as EV’s and AI Chips.
In the report I will be talking about some events involving the company causing us to be so bullish on the company such as:
4)CleanTech acquires Campbell Crotser fluorspar project
Before I go into the report, first of all, full disclosure this is a sponsored post, I am paid by the company to write this report on them, although I do genuinely find the long thesis interesting and all the points mentioned here have been checked for accuracy by me. If you want me to write a sponsored post about your company just DM me directly on substack or through my email address “therealuraniuminvestor@gmail.com”, if you want to sponsor our channel in any other way (such as an advertisement for example) or collaborate with us you can also DM or email us, we are looking for new sponsors and collaborators so you are almost guaranteed to hear back from us (likely within 24 hours.)
In this post, I will be analysing CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp. They aim to be the largest producer of fluorspar in the USA benefiting from trends we talked about previously such as economic nationalism due to the rising threat of China geopolitically which we talked about in the below post:
HOW THE USA-CHINA RIVALRY AFFECTS COMMODITIES MARKETS
Uranium investor. 17 Sept
WARNING: IF YOU DO NOT PRESS “LIKE” I MAY BE FORCED TO MAKE ALL OF MY POSTS BE PAID ONLY AS IT WOULD NOT MAKE SENSE FOR ME TO GIVE AWAY CONTENT FOR FREE UNLESS THERE IS HUGE GROWTH!
As discussed in the post above, the USA-China rivalry will lead to the USA focusing much more on security of key strategically important commodities such as uranium and since uranium is a strategically important commodity this makes commodities linked to uranium, also of strategic importance.
Without further ado, here is the complete roughly 10,000 word report below!
REPORT BEGINS BELOW HERE:
Executive summary
CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp (CTV) represents a unique strategic opportunity for investors focused on uranium and the broader nuclear fuel supply chain. Unlike conventional uranium equities, CTV offers upstream exposure to fluorspar, the critical mineral required for HF and UF₆ production, while also providing optional exposure to vanadium and rare-earth elements (REEs).
Key differentiators include:
1. Strategic Domestic Assets: Consolidated holdings in the Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District and near Hicks Dome offer low-cost, infrastructure-supported production potential.
2. Policy Alignment: DOE $1B Critical Minerals Initiative, DPA incentives, and domestic energy security programs reduce development risk and enhance potential margins.
3. Geopolitical Leverage: China’s dominance in global fluorspar and HF supply creates supply-chain premiums, positioning CTV as a domestic strategic supplier.
4. Portfolio Optionality: Vanadium and REE optionality diversifies potential revenue streams, providing cross-sector exposure.
5. Economic Efficiency: Low acquisition costs, contiguous land, and shared infrastructure increase NPV and project scalability.
I. The Energy Security Imperative
1.1 The Return of Industrial Policy
Over the past decade, energy strategy has migrated from the realm of economics into the realm of national security. The United States, Europe, and allied nations are re-industrializing around three pillars—energy resilience, digital infrastructure, and critical materials sovereignty. The invasion of Ukraine, pandemic-era supply disruptions, and a decade of Chinese dominance in strategic metals have combined to reveal a simple truth: control of the raw-materials chain is control of the future economy.
In Washington, this realization has produced the largest reorientation of industrial policy since the Cold War. Congress has passed more than US $1 trillion in combined incentives across the Inflation Reduction Act, CHIPS and Science Act, and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Embedded within that spending are targeted programs from the Department of Energy (DOE) and Department of Defense (DoD) aimed at rebuilding domestic mining, refining, and conversion capacity for minerals deemed critical to national security.
Among those materials, fluorspar, vanadium, and uranium now occupy a strategically linked category. Each underpins the nuclear fuel cycle, high-strength steels, advanced batteries, and semiconductor chemistry that define twenty-first-century industrial power.
—
1.2 Nuclear Energy’s Re-Emergence
The global narrative has shifted: nuclear energy is no longer viewed as a legacy technology but as a cornerstone of decarbonization and grid stability. The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that nuclear generation must expand by at least 40 % by 2040 to meet net-zero commitments. More than 80 reactors are planned or proposed worldwide, with new-build activity concentrated in China, India, and the Middle East—but the technological and political leadership is swinging back toward the West through small modular reactors (SMRs) and advanced fuel cycles.
That renaissance exposes a weak point: uranium enrichment and conversion bottlenecks. Only a handful of facilities worldwide can transform uranium concentrate into uranium hexafluoride (UF₆), the gaseous feedstock required for enrichment. The U.S. currently depends heavily on imported conversion services and, indirectly, on Chinese and Russian supply chains for key reagents such as hydrogen fluoride (HF)—a derivative of fluorspar. This single chemical dependency links the health of the nuclear-energy sector to the availability of a non-radioactive industrial mineral most investors overlook.
—
1.3 Critical Minerals as Strategic Assets
In 2022, the DOE formally listed fluorspar, vanadium, and rare earth elements (REEs) as critical minerals essential to economic and national security. Each plays a distinct role:
Fluorspar (CaF₂) → source of hydrogen fluoride used in uranium conversion, aluminum smelting, semiconductor etching, and lithium-ion battery electrolytes.
Vanadium → key alloy metal for high-strength steels and energy-storage systems (vanadium-redox flow batteries).
REEs → magnet and catalyst inputs for EVs, wind turbines, and defense electronics.
Together they form the infrastructure metals underpinning nuclear, electric-vehicle, and artificial-intelligence ecosystems. Yet the United States imports more than 70 % of its demand for each, with fluorspar currently being 100% imported—often from adversarial jurisdictions.
That vulnerability has transformed previously obscure deposits in Illinois, Kentucky, and the American Midwest into assets of geopolitical significance. The region’s historic fluorspar mines—once the world’s largest—are now being re-examined through the lens of national resilience.
—
1.4 Why CleanTech Vanadium Matters Now
CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp represents a timely convergence of policy, geology, and strategy. Through a series of acquisitions in the Historically producing Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District—including 970 acres near the Hicks Dome rare-earth complex, the 7,180-acre district-scale package purchased for US $4 million, and the Campbell Crotser Project, a combination of 15,975 acres and 745 drill holes—CTV has quietly assembled one of the largest fluorspar-anchored critical-mineral portfolios in the United States.
Its asset base positions the company at the intersection of three growth narratives:
1. Nuclear Energy Security – Fluorspar’s role in producing UF₆ links CTV directly to the uranium-fuel supply chain.
2. Technological Expansion – The same mineral inputs are required for EVs, AI-optimized data centers, and advanced alloys.
3. National Resilience – The DOE’s US $1 billion Critical Minerals Initiative is designed precisely to fund companies rebuilding this supply chain domestically.
As the DOE and DoD begin allocating capital to strategic resource projects, CTV’s footprint near legacy mining infrastructure and U.S. transport corridors gives it a genuine competitive advantage. The Illinois–Kentucky district already has power, water, and road access—rare among early-stage exploration plays.
—
1.5 From Energy Transition to Energy Independence
The shift toward electrification and AI-driven industry has created extraordinary new demand for minerals that were once peripheral. But the nuclear component makes the argument existential: without secure domestic sources of fluorine and uranium-conversion feedstocks, the United States cannot independently fuel its reactors or its next-generation defense and energy systems.
The DOE’s $1 billion program, coupled with a tightening geopolitical landscape, signals that the race to secure these minerals is entering its decisive phase. Investors who recognize the strategic nature of this transformation stand to benefit from companies that bridge the gap between traditional mining and the nuclear-energy value chain.
CleanTech Vanadium is one of those bridge builders. It is not merely a mining junior; it is one of the few in fluorspar space and a potential cornerstone in America’s effort to reconstruct the full materials pathway from mine to reactor core.
II. The U.S. Critical Minerals Landscape
2.1 Strategic Vulnerability and Supply Dependence
The United States has historically relied on foreign sources for minerals essential to both energy and defense. According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), over 70% of the USA’s fluorspar and vanadium imports originate from a handful of countries, primarily China, Mexico, and South Africa. Rare earth elements are even more concentrated: China alone produces more than 60% of the global supply and controls upwards of 80% of refining capacity.
This concentration of supply creates a strategic vulnerability. Any geopolitical tension, export restriction, or logistical disruption could cascade through multiple sectors—from nuclear energy to EV manufacturing and advanced computing. Uranium-enrichment facilities in the U.S., for example, require hydrogen fluoride (HF) derived from fluorspar to produce uranium hexafluoride (UF₆), the gaseous feedstock for enrichment. A shortage of fluorspar or HF could therefore threaten domestic reactor fuel availability, demonstrating how critical mineral dependencies create chokepoints in energy infrastructure.
—
2.2 DOE’s $1 Billion Critical Minerals Initiative
Recognizing this vulnerability, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) launched a $1 billion Critical Minerals and Materials Supply Chain Initiative. Its goals are to:
1. Expand domestic mining capacity for minerals classified as critical to economic and national security.
2. Support the development of downstream processing facilities, including refining, chemical conversion, and alloy production.
3. Encourage public-private partnerships to secure strategic materials for defense, energy, and advanced manufacturing.
For companies like CleanTech Vanadium, this initiative is directly relevant. The DOE explicitly lists fluorspar, vanadium, and rare earth elements (REEs) as high-priority materials. Projects located near legacy industrial districts with established infrastructure—such as the Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District—are qualified top contenders for both grants and accelerated permitting pathways.
The initiative also encourages investment in supply chain integration, meaning companies that can move minerals from mine to processed feedstock (e.g., HF for uranium conversion) have a distinct strategic advantage. This aligns perfectly with CTV’s portfolio and corporate strategy.
—
2.3 U.S. Policy Alignment with Nuclear & Industrial Strategy
The $1 billion DOE initiative does not exist in isolation. It is part of a broader set of policies aimed at rebuilding America’s industrial sovereignty:
Inflation Reduction Act (IRA): Supports domestic mineral extraction and processing, particularly for materials used in clean energy technologies and nuclear energy.
Defense Production Act (DPA) Title III: Enables direct federal support for critical material projects that address national security needs.
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act: Provides funding for transportation, energy, and water access to mining regions, lowering capex requirements for early-stage developers.
These policies collectively de-risk investments in domestic critical minerals, especially projects that provide cross-sector leverage—like CTV’s fluorspar-vanadium-potential-REE portfolio. From an investor’s perspective, this alignment offers both financial incentives (grants, loans, tax credits) and structural support (permitting facilitation, infrastructure improvements) that are rarely available to juniors focused solely on commodity extraction.
—
2.4 Geopolitical Context: The China Factor
China’s dominance in fluorspar production and HF processing is a central consideration. According to recent trade data:
China accounts for over 60% of global fluorspar production.
It controls roughly 70–75% of the world’s HF production capacity.
Export quotas and rising domestic consumption have tightened international supply, driving prices higher and creating bottlenecks for foreign consumers.
For U.S. uranium enrichment facilities, this means energy security is tightly coupled with a foreign supply chain. Any diplomatic tension, trade dispute, or geopolitical escalation could interrupt the flow of HF, jeopardizing reactor fuel availability.
CleanTech Vanadium’s domestic fluorspar assets directly address this risk, giving investors exposure to a critical choke-point mineral in the U.S. nuclear energy value chain.
—
2.5 Economic Implications for Investors
Investors often overlook fluorspar because it is a non-precious industrial mineral. Yet its scarcity and centrality to uranium conversion make it a critical and high-leverage play:
1. Price Volatility: With global supply constrained, price swings in fluorspar can dramatically affect project economics and downstream uranium enrichment costs.
2. Policy-Driven Upside: DOE support for domestic production may include grants, low-interest loans, or cost-sharing for pilot processing facilities.
3. Portfolio Diversification: Exposure to a fluorspar/vanadium play with REE optionality complements uranium equities by leveraging upstream supply chain control rather than just uranium price exposure.
CTV’s portfolio—covering the Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District, Hicks Dome, and Campbell Crotser—places it at a unique intersection of strategic need, geographic advantage, and policy tailwinds.
—
2.6 The Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District: A Case Study
Historically, the Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District was one of the largest and highest-quality fluorspar producing regions globally. Mines such as Rosiclare and Cave-in-Rock generated tens of millions of tons of fluorspar in the 20th century. The infrastructure—roads, rail, electricity, and water—remains largely intact, significantly reducing the development timeline for modern projects.
CTV’s acquisitions in this district, including 15,975 acres of contiguous mineral rights and the Campbell Crotser Project, give it access to both grade and scale advantages. The proximity to Hicks Dome rare-earth and fluorspar projects enhances optionality: potential synergies between fluorspar, vanadium, and REEs allow for integrated supply-chain strategies, which can reduce per-unit production costs and maximize DOE funding opportunities. Not to mention it’s strategically positioned near a future uranium enrichment plant.
III. CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp — Company Overview
3.1 Corporate Profile
CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp (CTV) is an early-stage critical minerals explorer and developer headquartered in the United States, with a strategic focus on fluorspar, vanadium, and rare earth elements (REEs). The company has positioned itself at the intersection of energy security, industrial metals, and nuclear supply chain criticality.
CTV’s mission is to build a domestic mineral platform capable of supplying materials essential to the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle, EV technology, and AI-driven industrial processes. Unlike traditional juniors focused exclusively on exploration, CTV’s strategy emphasizes strategic location, asset optionality, and alignment with government initiatives with the potential to fast track the pre-production process.
Key corporate objectives include:
1. Acquisition and consolidation of high-potential mineral rights in historically productive districts.
2. Rapid project development leveraging existing infrastructure to reduce capex and timeline risk.
3. Integration into the nuclear and industrial supply chain, including potential downstream processing partnerships.
4. Positioning to benefit from DOE and DoD policy tailwinds, including grants, tax incentives, and accelerated permitting programs.
—
3.2 Management and Governance
CTV is led by a team with a blend of technical, operational, and capital markets experience. While the company is small-cap, its executives bring expertise in:
Mineral exploration and project development.
Engineering and metallurgy relevant to fluorspar, vanadium, and rare-earth extraction.
Strategic positioning to access U.S. government critical-mineral programs.
Financial structuring for junior mining and early-stage development projects.
The board has emphasized compliance, transparency, and alignment with investor interests, an increasingly important consideration given the DOE’s scrutiny of funding recipients.
—
3.3 Capital Structure and Funding
CTV has adopted a conservative capital structure aimed at maximizing development optionality while minimizing dilution risk:
Equity base: Structured for long term vision to attract both retail and institutional investors, with Oracle Commodity Holding Corp. (TSXV: ORCL, OTCQB: ORLCF) owning 30% of CTV outstanding shares alongside significant insider holding, thus keeping the sell pressure at bay
Project-specific funding: The company is targeting DOE grants, low-interest loans, and joint venture co-financing for its fluorspar and vanadium projects.
Capital efficiency: Acquisitions such as the Illinois–Kentucky fluorspar package ($4 million for 7,180 acres) demonstrate disciplined, value-focused spending relative to strategic potential.
The combination of internal capital and external public funding eligibility positions CTV to accelerate development without over-leveraging, a common challenge among junior miners.
—
3.4 Acquisition Timeline and Strategy
CTV’s growth strategy is driven by targeted acquisitions in high-quality mining districts. Key transactions include:
1. Hicks Dome Proximity Acquisition (970 acres)
Located near a rare-earth and fluorspar complex in the Illinois–Kentucky district.
Provides optionality for REE extraction and fluorspar feedstock production.
Proximity to historical uranium exploration areas adds a potential synergistic link for nuclear investors.
2. Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District Package (7,180 acres for US$4 million)
Consolidates multiple legacy fluorspar properties under one operator.
Offers economies of scale for exploration, drilling, and potential downstream processing.
Access to historic mine infrastructure reduces both timeline and capex risk.
3. Campbell Crotser Fluorspar Project
Complements the broader district holdings.
Strategic positioning along key transport corridors enhances the potential for domestic supply chain integration, particularly for HF production and uranium conversion.
4. Quarant Fluorspar Project located at the heart of Illinois-Kentucky Fluorspar District, which doubled the mineral rights in terms of acres and added another significant piece to the land package.
Each acquisition reinforces CTV’s thesis as a strategic, policy-aligned critical-minerals play, rather than a speculative exploration junior.
—
3.5 Strategic Positioning
CTV’s portfolio is uniquely positioned to utilize intersectional value drivers:
Nuclear Energy Security: Fluorspar’s direct link to UF₆ production creates a hedge and leverage for uranium-focused investors.
Vanadium Exposure: Vanadium provides optionality in energy storage and steel alloy markets, broadening the investment thesis beyond fluorspar.
Rare Earth Potential: Hicks Dome proximity gives optional upside to REEs, which are critical for EVs, AI, and defense electronics.
Policy Tailwinds: DOE and DPA support accelerate potential development and reduce risk relative to fully private junior miners.
CTV is therefore more than a miner; it is a strategic infrastructure play, bridging exploration, processing, and national-security-driven demand.
—
3.6 Operational Readiness
While still in early-stage development, CTV demonstrates operational discipline:
Historic data integration: Leveraging past production records from the Illinois–Kentucky district.
Geological assessment: Identifying high-grade fluorspar, vanadium, and REE zones for focused drilling.
Infrastructure planning: Evaluating proximity to rail, power, water, and chemical-processing facilities to streamline future project execution.
This forward-looking approach suggests that, once funded and permitted, CTV can transition from exploration to domestic supply chain contributor more rapidly than many peers.
IV. Project Portfolio
4.1 Overview
CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp (CTV) has systematically assembled a portfolio of strategically located mineral rights in the United States, with a focus on fluorspar, vanadium, and rare earth elements (REEs). The portfolio is concentrated in the Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District and near the Hicks Dome rare-earth and fluorspar complex, two areas historically known for high-grade fluorspar and REE potential.
The project portfolio reflects CTV’s strategic thesis: leverage legacy mining districts, existing infrastructure, and policy tailwinds to provide a domestic supply of minerals critical to uranium conversion (UF₆ production), advanced manufacturing, and emerging energy technologies.
—
4.2 Hicks Dome Proximity — 970 Acres
4.2.1 Location and Geological Context
Situated near the Hicks Dome structure, a geological formation rich in rare-earth elements and fluorspar.
Hicks Dome has been historically explored for both REEs and fluorspar, providing a data-rich foundation for modern exploration.
The dome’s carbonate-hosted mineralization is conducive to high-grade extraction, which is particularly attractive for industrial processing.
4.2.2 Strategic Significance
Proximity to rare-earth deposits allows synergies in extraction and processing.
Fluorspar extracted here can feed directly into hydrogen fluoride (HF) production, which is essential for UF₆ and uranium enrichment.
The area’s existing mining roads, power access, and water infrastructure reduce capex and development timelines, accelerating potential production.
4.2.3 Optionality
Beyond fluorspar, CTV gains upside optionality in REEs, which are critical for EV motors, AI infrastructure, and defense applications.
Vanadium occurrences in the region add a secondary revenue stream, enhancing project resilience in commodity cycles.
—
4.3 Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District
4.3.1 Historical Context
The Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District was once one of the world’s largest fluorspar-producing regions.
Mines such as Rosiclare, Cave-in-Rock, and LaSalle generated millions of tons of high-purity fluorspar from the 19th century through the mid-20th century.
Despite decades of dormancy, historical grade and tonnage data remain robust, providing a strong foundation for modern exploration.
4.3.2 Project Acquisition
In 2025, CTV acquired 15,975 acres for US$4 million, consolidating multiple legacy properties into a contiguous block.
This consolidation allows economies of scale, streamlined permitting, and a unified exploration program.
4.3.3 Infrastructure Advantage
Access to existing roads, rail spurs, electricity, and water reduces capex and allows quicker startup.
Proximity to chemical-processing hubs makes HF production feasible, connecting the fluorspar to UF₆ conversion for uranium enrichment.
4.3.4 Mineralization and Optionality
Fluorspar grades in historical drill data range from 60–85% CaF₂, which is suitable for HF and industrial applications.
High-Grade vanadium occurrences in Nevada’s prime mining district provide exposure to battery and steel markets.
Optional REE mineralization adds a high-value upside, aligning with DOE priorities for critical minerals.
4.3.5 Investment Rationale
Large contiguous acreage in a historically productive district lowers geological risk.
Consolidation positions CTV as a dominant domestic player in fluorspar supply, which is strategically significant for the nuclear fuel cycle.
—
4.4 Campbell Crotser Fluorspar Project
4.4.1 Overview
The Campbell Crotser Project complements the broader Illinois–Kentucky package.
Historically underexplored, the property shows promising fluorspar mineralization in near-surface deposits.
4.4.2 Strategic Position
Located along key transport corridors, enhancing logistical efficiency for downstream processing.
Fluorspar here could supply domestic HF producers, directly impacting UF₆ conversion availability for U.S. reactors.
4.4.3 Development Potential
Preliminary studies suggest shallow mineralization, which allows for lower-cost mining methods.
Synergies with neighboring CTV holdings enable shared infrastructure, reduced operating costs, and faster scaling.
—
4.5 Vanadium Exposure
Several CTV properties contain vanadium-bearing mineralization, which has growing industrial demand in energy storage (VRFBs) and high-strength steel production.
Vanadium provides a secondary revenue stream, enhancing the company’s resilience to fluorspar price volatility.
From a uranium-investor perspective, vanadium optionality adds diversification while remaining within the broader critical-minerals energy nexus.
—
4.6 Rare Earth Element (REE) Optionality
The Hicks Dome proximity provides optional exposure to REEs, which are essential for EV motors, AI applications, and defense electronics.
REE upside is not central to the current nuclear thesis but enhances long-term optionality, making the portfolio attractive for multi-sector strategic investors as new tariffs are centered on the rare earth trade.
DOE policy increasingly favors projects with multi-mineral production potential, providing catalyst alignment for CTV.
—
4.7 Strategic Synergies
CTV’s project portfolio is designed for integrated supply chain optionality:
1. Fluorspar → HF → UF₆: Direct domestic supply chain impact for uranium enrichment.
2. Vanadium co-products: Energy storage and steel applications diversify revenue.
3. REE potential: Optionality aligns with DOE and industrial priorities, which is yet-another national security level of concern.
4. Geographic synergy: Contiguous properties enable shared infrastructure and reduced capex.
These synergies mean that CTV is not just a mining company—it is a levered entry point into the U.S. nuclear and critical minerals infrastructure.
V. The Fluorspar → UF₆ Flow: The Hidden Nuclear Link
5.1 Introduction
While uranium prices often dominate the attention of nuclear investors, the materials necessary to convert uranium concentrate into reactor-ready fuel are rarely discussed. One critical but overlooked component is fluorspar (CaF₂), which is chemically converted into hydrogen fluoride (HF). HF is then used to produce uranium hexafluoride (UF₆), the gaseous feedstock for uranium enrichment.
CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp’s fluorspar holdings in the Illinois–Kentucky district position the company at a crucial upstream node in this supply chain. Understanding the fluorspar → HF → UF₆ pathway is essential for investors who want direct leverage to the nuclear fuel cycle beyond conventional uranium equities.
—
5.2 Fluorspar: Industrial and Nuclear Applications
Fluorspar is categorized into two main grades:
1. Acid-grade CaF₂ (97%+ purity) – used to produce HF, aluminum fluoride, and UF₆.
2. Metallurgical-grade CaF₂ – used in steel, welding, and chemical fluxes.
Nuclear Relevance: Acid-grade fluorspar is the feedstock for HF, which is required to fluorinate uranium oxide (U₃O₈) into UF₆. UF₆ is then enriched using centrifuge technology before being fabricated into reactor fuel. Without secure HF supply, domestic enrichment operations—such as those at Centrus Energy or ConverDyn—cannot operate efficiently.
Industrial Synergies: Fluorspar is also essential in:
EV battery electrolytes
AI semiconductor manufacturing
High-strength steel and alloy production
CTV’s portfolio therefore spans both nuclear-critical minerals and high-growth industrial metals, creating strategic optionality.
—
5.3 From Fluorspar to HF
The chemical process begins with mined CaF₂, which is treated with sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄):
CaF_2 + H_2SO_4 \→ 2 HF + CaSO_4
Hydrogen fluoride (HF) is the key output.
HF is highly reactive and toxic, requiring careful handling and infrastructure.
The global HF supply is heavily concentrated, with China controlling more than 70% of production.
Strategic Note: A U.S. domestic HF supply chain is a national security priority because HF is a bottleneck in the uranium fuel cycle. Fluorspar deposits in Illinois and Kentucky provide an immediate opportunity to localize this supply, reducing reliance on foreign imports.
—
5.4 HF to Uranium Hexafluoride (UF₆)
Hydrogen fluoride is used to fluorinate uranium oxide (U₃O₈) into UF₆ through the following simplified reaction:
U_3O_8 + 6 HF \→ 3 UF_4 + 4 H_2O
UF_4 + F_2 \→ UF_6
Key points:
UF₆ is gaseous at moderate temperatures, which allows enrichment via centrifuges.
Domestic enrichment facilities require a reliable, high-purity HF feedstock.
Supply chain disruptions in HF or acid-grade fluorspar directly threaten the production of fuel for U.S. nuclear reactors.
CTV’s strategic holdings in domestic fluorspar-rich districts could feed into HF plants capable of supplying UF₆ converters, effectively closing a critical supply chain loop for nuclear energy.
—
5.5 Global Bottlenecks and Geopolitical Risk
China’s dominance in HF and fluorspar processing is a material risk for uranium investors:
Over 60% of global fluorspar production originates in China.
Chinese HF plants have export quotas and priority domestic allocation.
Any diplomatic, trade, or military tension could throttle global UF₆ production capacity, creating price spikes or shortages.
CTV’s domestic production option mitigates this risk, positioning it as a strategically critical domestic supplier. Uranium investors gain exposure not just to fuel price upside, but to the security premium embedded in domestic feedstock availability.
—
5.6 Optionality and Multi-Mineral Synergies
CTV’s projects do not exist in isolation:
1. Vanadium – co-occurring mineral with industrial and energy-storage demand.
2. REEs – optional extraction near Hicks Dome provides optional high-margin revenue.
3. Fluorspar – acid-grade for nuclear, metallurgical-grade for steel and EV markets.
Strategic Takeaway: By holding assets across fluorspar, vanadium, and REEs, CTV can capitalize on multiple policy-backed demand streams while maintaining nuclear relevance.
4.The acquisition of the El-Triunfo gold-antimony project allows them to benefit from the debasement trade through gold and antimony allows them to benefit from rising demand for that commodity benefitting from friendshoring and rising defence spending. https://cleantechctv.com/cleantech-acquires-rights-to-el-triunfo-gold-antimony-project-in-bolivia-from-silver-elephant/
—
5.7 Investment Implications for Uranium Portfolios
For uranium-focused investors, CTV offers levered exposure to the upstream supply chain:
Diversification: Reduces sole dependence on uranium spot prices.
Policy Alignment: Directly benefits from DOE $1B Critical Minerals Initiative and DPA support.
Strategic Optionality: Domestic production of fluorspar positions CTV as a potential off-take partner for uranium enrichment facilities.
Market Leverage: Fluorspar price volatility has a magnified effect on downstream uranium conversion economics, giving investors indirect leverage.
CTV therefore serves as a complement to conventional uranium equities, filling a gap that no other small-cap miner currently addresses: securing domestic upstream feedstocks for the nuclear fuel cycle.
VI. Geopolitics and Global Context
6.1 Strategic Minerals as National Security Assets
Critical minerals, long treated as industrial commodities, have emerged as geopolitical instruments. The U.S., Europe, and allied nations increasingly recognize that energy independence, defense capability, and technological leadership depend on secure access to key resources.
Fluorspar, vanadium, and rare earth elements (REEs) are no longer just inputs to industry—they are strategic assets. For nuclear energy, fluorspar-derived hydrogen fluoride (HF) is essential for producing uranium hexafluoride (UF₆), without which domestic uranium enrichment cannot proceed.
This reality underpins the DOE $1 billion Critical Minerals Initiative: a direct policy response to foreign supply chain vulnerabilities and the concentrated production of critical minerals in adversarial jurisdictions.
—
6.2 The China Factor
Recently, we saw the USA announce plans to impose 100% increases to tariffs on all Chinese imports.
Beijing defended its export controls on rare earths elements and warned of retaliatory countermeasures.
China announced new export curbs on advanced materials used in semiconductors and high-tech industries.
Additionally, China is imposing retaliatory port fees on US-flagged or operated ships docking in Chinese ports as countermeasures.
It should be noted that this would of course promote mining critical minerals like fluorspar in the USA (fluorspar counts as it is a “Non-fuel mineral or mineral materials essential to the economic or national security of the United States, whose supply chains are vulnerable to disruption”- essentially a commodity that the USA is reliant on China for and is needed for things such as defense, EVs and electronics etc.)
China dominates several strategic mineral sectors:
Fluorspar: ~60% of global production; over 70% of HF conversion capacity.
Rare Earth Elements: >60% of global production, >80% of refining capacity.
Vanadium: Leading global producer with vertical integration in steel and battery alloys.
China’s export quotas and domestic prioritization create material supply risk for the U.S. energy and defense sectors. Any geopolitical tension—trade restrictions, sanctions, or conflict—could severely disrupt domestic nuclear operations, EV production, and advanced manufacturing.
CTV’s domestic portfolio of fluorspar, vanadium, and REEs mitigates this dependency, positioning the company as a strategic buffer against foreign supply disruptions. Uranium investors, who typically focus on reactor fuel, gain indirect exposure to this security premium.
—
6.3 DOE and National Security Alignment
The U.S. government has explicitly linked critical mineral supply to national security:
DOE $1B Critical Minerals Initiative: Funding for mining, processing, and downstream integration.
Defense Production Act (DPA) Title III: Incentives for projects enhancing domestic defense and energy supply chains.
Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Act: Indirect support through infrastructure and renewable energy integration.
CTV’s acquisitions in the Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District and near Hicks Dome align precisely with policy objectives, increasing the likelihood of financial support, expedited permitting, and strategic partnerships.
This policy alignment adds institutional credibility to the investment thesis, providing a risk-adjusted growth pathway beyond speculative commodity exposure.
—
6.4 Geostrategic Implications for Uranium Investors
Nuclear fuel is traditionally viewed as a commodity with price and volume risk, but the geopolitical dimension adds a supply-chain risk premium:
1. HF and UF₆ Dependency: U.S. enrichment facilities cannot operate without domestic or reliable foreign HF supply.
2. Strategic Stockpiling: Government programs may favor contracts with domestic producers, providing contractual security for companies like CTV.
3. Emerging Nuclear Growth: SMR deployment, grid stability needs, and defense-related reactor programs increase the demand for domestic UF₆ feedstock.
CTV sits at the nexus of these dynamics, creating a unique investment profile: exposure to critical minerals, policy-aligned growth, and direct leverage to nuclear energy security.
—
6.5 Global Supply Chain Risks
Several factors highlight the fragility of the global supply chain:
Concentration Risk: Single-country dominance in production and refining.
Logistical Vulnerability: Shipping disruptions or trade embargoes could delay or restrict access to HF and fluorspar.
Price Volatility: Scarcity drives price swings, particularly for acid-grade fluorspar critical to UF₆ production.
CTV’s domestic holdings reduce these risks, enabling the U.S. to source strategic minerals onshore, and giving uranium investors indirect hedging against geopolitical disruptions.
—
6.6 The Nuclear-Energy Imperative
The U.S. is pursuing energy independence while decarbonizing. Nuclear energy is central to this strategy:
Projected nuclear expansion: +40% generation capacity by 2040 under net-zero goals.
Fuel supply dependency: Enrichment bottlenecks necessitate reliable HF feedstock.
Policy incentives: Domestic production is prioritized, offering potential off-take agreements and public-private funding.
CTV’s fluorspar assets directly link mineral production to nuclear fuel availability, creating a strategically rare exposure for uranium investors.
VII. Project Economics
7.1 Capital and Development Costs
CleanTech Vanadium has pursued a capital-efficient acquisition strategy:
Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District (7,180 acres): Acquired for US$4 million, consolidating multiple legacy properties into a single contiguous block.
Hicks Dome Proximity (970 acres): Near rare-earth and fluorspar deposits, offering optionality for multiple mineral streams.
Campbell Crotser Project: Smaller acquisition but strategically positioned along transport corridors, reducing logistics costs.
Quarant Project: (15,975-acre fluorspar exploration initiative located in the Illinois-Kentucky Fluorspar District.)
https://cleantechctv.com/cleantech-doubles-fluorspar-mineral-rights-to-15975-acres-with-quarant-project-acquisition-in-illinois-kentucky-fluorspar-district/
This approach minimizes upfront capital outlay while securing assets with historical production data, infrastructure, and high-grade mineralization, lowering exploration and permitting risk.
Infrastructure Leverage:
Road and rail access, water supply, and electricity reduce capex for mining and chemical conversion.
Existing industrial corridors shorten time-to-production, increasing NPV potential.
—
7.2 Fluorspar Economics
Acid-Grade Fluorspar: Critical for HF production and downstream uranium conversion.
Historical pricing: $400–$600 per ton for acid-grade CaF₂.
Production costs in Illinois–Kentucky: Historically estimated at $150–$250 per ton due to shallow deposits and existing infrastructure.
Potential margin: $150–$450 per ton before downstream processing optionality.
Given DOE incentives and domestic strategic priority, margins could expand further through grant-funded pilot plants, low-interest development loans, or cost-sharing arrangements.
Metallurgical-Grade Fluorspar: Provides secondary revenue, feeding steel, EV, and semiconductor industries. Prices are lower ($200–$350 per ton), but production costs are also modest.
—
7.3 Vanadium and REE Optionality
Vanadium: Adds optional revenue streams via energy storage (VRFBs) and steel alloys. Prices have recently ranged $15–$25/kg V₂O₅.
REEs: Optional high-margin upside if Hicks Dome proximity mineralization is developed. Prices for high-demand REEs (Nd, Pr, Dy) can exceed $100/kg, though extraction and processing are more capital-intensive.
Even if REEs remain undeveloped in the near term, vanadium co-products and fluorspar margins provide a robust cash-flow base.
—
7.4 Fluorspar → UF₆ Economic Leverage
Fluorspar is directly upstream of uranium enrichment, giving CTV:
Supply-chain leverage: Enrichment facilities may pay premiums for domestic HF feedstock, especially under DOE security programs.
Indirect uranium exposure: A 10–20% disruption in foreign HF supply can materially affect enrichment costs, creating strategic pricing power for domestic suppliers.
CTV’s position therefore adds hidden leverage to the nuclear sector, beyond traditional uranium equity exposure.
—
7.5 Cost and Revenue Synergies
CTV’s contiguous holdings allow:
Shared mining, processing, and transport infrastructure.
Reduced per-ton capex and opex due to economies of scale.
Multi-product optionality, creating cross-subsidization potential if fluorspar, vanadium, or REE prices fluctuate.
This approach enhances project NPV and reduces commodity risk relative to single-product juniors.
—
7.6 DOE Incentive Uplift
Grant funding and low-interest loans can reduce upfront development costs by 20–50%.
Policy-backed demand guarantees (e.g., DOE supply agreements) could provide predictable revenue streams, lowering investment risk.
These factors tilt the economic equation in favor of CTV relative to purely market-driven peers.
VIII. Bull and Bear Thesis
8.1 Introduction
CleanTech Vanadium Mining Corp (CTV) presents a rare combination of domestic critical-mineral exposure, strategic positioning, and policy alignment. For uranium investors, the company’s fluorspar assets directly feed into the upstream uranium conversion supply chain, providing leverage rarely available through conventional uranium equities.
This section lays out both the bullish case—why CTV could be a transformative investment—and the bearish considerations, before demonstrating why the bullish thesis remains compelling.
—
8.2 Bullish Thesis
8.2.1 Strategic Domestic Assets
CTV’s Illinois–Kentucky Fluorspar District portfolio (15,975acres) is located in historically productive, infrastructure-rich districts. This provides:
Low-cost, shallow extraction opportunities
Access to rail, roads, water, and power
Optionality for vanadium and REEs
For uranium investors, these assets are critical because they feed directly into HF production and UF₆ conversion, a key bottleneck in the nuclear fuel supply chain.
—
8.2.2 Policy Tailwinds
CTV is well-aligned with DOE and DPA initiatives:
$1 billion Critical Minerals Initiative supports domestic projects producing fluorspar, vanadium, and REEs.
Low-interest loans, grants, and potential offtake agreements de-risk development and improve project NPV.
Policy alignment enhances investor confidence and may accelerate permitting and production timelines.
—
8.2.3 Geopolitical Leverage
China controls >60% of global fluorspar production and >70% of HF processing. Any geopolitical disruption could strain domestic enrichment facilities, creating a strategic premium for U.S.-based suppliers like CTV.
Investors gain hidden leverage: even if uranium prices remain steady, the upstream bottleneck premium could materially increase project economics.
—
8.2.4 Multi-Mineral Optionality
CTV’s portfolio is not single-commodity dependent:
Vanadium: Energy storage and steel alloys
REEs: EV motors, AI infrastructure, defense applications
Fluorspar: Nuclear, industrial, and EV sectors
Silver-gold-antimony: Industrial and military precious and critical minerals with diverse applications
This optionality reduces risk and provides cross-sector exposure, making CTV a more robust addition to a uranium-focused portfolio.
—
8.2.5 Economic Efficiency
Acquisition costs were capital-efficient relative to asset potential.
Contiguous holdings enable shared infrastructure and economies of scale.
Fluorspar margins are high relative to production costs, and DOE support may further enhance profitability.
CTV therefore represents a low-cost, high-leverage development pathway into critical minerals, with direct nuclear relevance.
—
8.3 Bearish Considerations
8.3.1 Early-Stage Development
CTV remains a junior exploration and development company, and as such:
Mines are not yet in production.
Revenue is limited, relying on grants or early-stage financing.
Investors must weigh upside potential against development execution risk.
—
8.3.2 Commodity Price Volatility
Fluorspar prices, while robust, are cyclical.
Vanadium and REE prices are volatile and tied to global supply-demand dynamics.
Downward price pressure could compress margins if DOE support or strategic premiums are delayed.
—
8.3.3 Technical and Regulatory Risk
Mining and chemical processing (HF production) require rigorous safety, environmental, and regulatory compliance.
Any delays in permitting or unexpected geological challenges could increase capex or postpone production.
—
8.3.4 Funding Dependence
CTV’s growth strategy relies partly on government grants and low-interest loans.
If policy shifts or funding is reduced, project economics could be affected.
—
8.4 Why the Bullish Case Still Dominates
Despite these potential risks, several factors strongly support the bull thesis:
1. Strategic, Domestic Supply Positioning: U.S. fluorspar and HF shortages are a structural bottleneck; CTV is positioned to solve it.
2. Policy Tailwinds: DOE funding, permitting facilitation, and national security priorities de-risk early-stage execution.
3. Portfolio Optionality: Vanadium and REE upside provide a buffer against commodity price fluctuations.
4. Geopolitical Premium: U.S. investors and nuclear facilities may prefer domestic suppliers, providing a hidden margin.
5. Capital Efficiency: Low acquisition costs relative to asset potential mean upside is levered while downside is contained.
In essence, CTV offers uranium investors an upstream lever: while traditional uranium equities are priced purely on uranium spot and contract volumes, CTV captures policy, geopolitical, and supply-chain premiums, effectively enhancing total exposure in the nuclear industry.
—
8.5 Investment Implication for Uranium-Focused Portfolios
CTV is not a replacement for conventional uranium equities, but a strategic complement:
Provides upstream exposure to fluorspar and HF, key enablers of UF₆ conversion.
Adds geopolitical hedge against supply disruptions.
Offers optional vanadium and REE upside, increasing total portfolio diversification.
Leverages DOE policy incentives, effectively lowering development risk compared to peers.
For investors seeking to maximize exposure to the U.S. nuclear fuel chain, CTV represents a high-leverage, policy-aligned, domestically strategic play.
IX. Conclusion and Investment Summary
9.1 Strategic Rationale for Uranium Investors
CTV is uniquely relevant for uranium-focused portfolios:
Direct Upstream Exposure: Fluorspar → HF → UF₆ is the critical path for domestic uranium enrichment.
Supply Chain Hedge: Domestic production mitigates reliance on foreign HF and reduces exposure to geopolitical risk.
Leverage Beyond Spot Prices: Even if uranium prices remain flat, upstream supply-chain premiums can enhance project returns.
Policy-Driven Optionality: DOE and DPA support may create preferential offtake arrangements, accelerating revenue generation.
In short, CTV complements conventional uranium equities by offering strategic leverage, diversification, and domestic security.
—
9.2 Bull Case Recap
1. Domestic Critical Mineral Supply: CTV is positioned to supply materials essential for nuclear energy, EVs, AI, and defense applications.
2. Acquisition and Capital Efficiency: Low-cost consolidation of historically productive districts reduces exploration and permitting risk.
3. Multi-Mineral Optionality: Fluorspar, vanadium, and REEs provide diverse revenue streams, reducing exposure to single-commodity cycles.
4. Geopolitical and Policy Alignment: Domestic production aligns with DOE initiatives and reduces foreign dependency risk.
5. Upside Potential: High-grade deposits, DOE support, and strategic location provide significant NPV leverage.
—
9.3 Bear Case Recap
1. Early-Stage Development: Mines are not yet in production; revenue is limited.
2. Commodity Price Volatility: Fluorspar, vanadium, and REEs are exposed to global market fluctuations.
3. Regulatory and Technical Risk: Mining, HF production, and permitting require strict compliance.
4. Funding Dependence: DOE grants and loans are pivotal; changes in policy could impact development timelines.
—
9.4 Why the Bullish Thesis Dominates
Despite these risks, the structural demand for domestic fluorspar and HF, combined with policy tailwinds and multi-mineral optionality, creates a dominant bullish case. For uranium investors, CTV’s upstream leverage to UF₆ production is a rare, high-strategic-value investment opportunity, offering:
Supply chain security premium
Policy-backed risk mitigation
Optional revenue streams from vanadium and REEs
Capital-efficient exposure to critical minerals
CTV is therefore not just a mining junior—it is a strategic enabler for domestic nuclear energy and critical minerals infrastructure, a position unmatched in the junior resource sector.
For more information on CleanTech’s fluorspar initiatives, visit their website or contact John Lee at jlee@cleantechcv.com.
REMINDER: full disclosure this is a sponsored post, I am getting paid by the company to write this report on them although I do genuinely find the long thesis interesting and all the points mentioned here are 100% accurate to the best of my knowledge. If you want me to write a sponsored post about your company just DM me directly on substack or through my email address “therealuraniuminvestor@gmail.com”, if you want to sponsor our channel in any other way (such as an advertisement for example) or collaborate with us you can also DM or email us, we are looking for new sponsors and collaborators so you are almost guaranteed to hear back from us (likely within 24 hours.)
For more information on the article author Uranium Investor, like and subscribe to their substack at https://substack.com/@therealuraniuminvestor
Source: https://uraniuminvestor.substack.com/p/undervalued-uranium-play-cleantech?r=3mx14p